Footnotes
- The other agencies involved in the review
process were: the United Nations Development Program (UNDP),
the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), the Asian Development
Bank (ADB), the International Union for the Conservation of Nature
(IUCN), the International Institute for Environment and Development
(IIED), the Australian International Development Assistance Bureau
(AIDAB), the New Zealand Ministry of External Relations and Trade,
and the German Federal Republic's technical cooperation agency
(GTZ).
- The World Bank's own recommendations were
not so generous to conservation projects, which only accounted
for about 25% of the funding proposed in Annex 10 of the TFAP
Review. The revised figures presented to the Round Table were
partly the result of a routine recosting of individual projects,
and partly due to the environmental sympathies of some PNG government
officials.
- The five provinces covered by this moratorium
were Central, Milne Bay, New Ireland, West New Britain and North
Solomons, all of which had witnessed extensive harvesting of
available timber resources. The same Cabinet submission recommended
an accelerated rate of extraction in three other less 'developed'
provinces - Western, West Sepik and East Sepik.
- Including five 'defunct projects to be revived'.
- It is not possible to assess the extent of
the overlap because the 27 areas were not precisely defined (see
Appendix 2) and the proposed logging operations were unlikely
to proceed according to plan, if they had a plan.
- These were four of the fourteen TRPs which
had been scheduled for development in 1989. The Minister did
not explicitly say whether the moratorium was meant to cover
Local Forest Areas, as well as Timber Rights Purchases, but,
in the light of abuses revealed by the Barnett Inquiry, he had
apparently conceded the need to repeal the Forestry (Private
Dealings) Act, under which the Minister has power to approve
LFAs, so one might infer from this that he did not intend to
approve any more.
- Some of the Round Table participants believed
that the Minister had been deceived into making this concession
because he had forgotten that the Lak project fell squarely within
the area proposed for World Heritage status, or had simply forgotten
to include this project in his list of exemptions. This is incorrect.
- The Lelet Plateau had been included in the
World Bank's list of proposed conservation areas (Area 24 in
Appendix 2). Danfu was one of several logging operations for
which no environmental plan had ever been submitted, and covered
the area adjacent to the Lak TRP. A visit to the Umbukul TRP
was justified by evidence that some local landowners were fiercely
opposed to the issue of a Timber Permit.
- Only these eight are shown as having participated
in the Woodlark expedition in Appendix 1.
- Even the helicopter was unable to penetrate
the blanket of rain surrounding the island of Lambom, off the
southern tip of the mainland, which contains roughly one third
of the Lak electorate.
- Two helicopter trips were needed to ferry
the debating team and the film crew from one point to another,
including the trips which took them from one end of New Ireland
to the other.
- This meant that four of the six projects
now being proposed for exemption were in provinces already covered
by the partial moratorium which Cabinet had imposed in July 1989.
- According to the newspaper report (Post-Courier
6/5/90), the logs had been shipped from Woodlark Island by Provincial
Land Air Sea Transport (PLAST), a company owned by Mr John Kasaipwalova,
one of the 'stars' of the Barnett Inquiry. The same report suggests
that the logs had been harvested by Milne Bay Logging Company
(MBL) through its contract with the landowner company, Woodlark
Island Development Corporation (WIDCO), but WIDCO's Environmental
Plan insists that ebony is harvested privately by the islanders
(WIDCO 1990:viii).
- The ebony pole makers of Japan may have
blessed their good fortune, because the Minister subsequently
announced the extension of his ban to include 'flitches', as
well as round logs (Post-Courier 4/5/90). On the other hand,
there is little evidence to suggest that any corresponding improvement
in the effectiveness of its enforcement.
- The other seven were: East Kikori (Gulf
Province); Buhem-Mongi and Cromwell (Morobe); Josephstaal, Biges
and South Naru (Madang); and Alimbit Andru (West New Britain).
The last of these is not a TRP but an LFA, which seems to indicate
that the Minister had intended his moratorium to include Local
Forest Areas.
- The two main targets were PNG Timbers, with
several projects in New Ireland, and Santa Investments, operating
mainly in the West Gadaisu TRP (Central Province). PNG Timbers
was known to be the contractor seeking access to the Lak TRP.
- In its Medium Term Development Strategy,
dated September 1989, DOF classified Musa and Collingwood Bay
as two distinct TRPs.
- To judge by their previous writings and
utterances, one might suppose that Messrs Narokobi and Anis would
have more sympathy for the conservationist cause than most of
their political counterparts. It seems that ideology was once
again the victim of political necessity.
- The main complaint was that JDC was only
a trust company, whose sole trustees were the Premier and Josephstaal
MPA Thomas Karukai, and therefore lacked a Board of Directors
which was fully accountable to the landowning clans of the TRP.
- One such extension (Wawoi Guavi Block 3)
was allocated on the 1st of June. Another two - Biges and South
Naru in Madang Province - were included in one or other of the
lists of 'exemptions' proposed by the Minister, thus neatly confusing
DEC officials, who later complained that his intention of granting
these two permits was a further breach of the moratorium.
- It should be noted, however, that 96,000
hectare Josephstaal TRP is now being subdivided into separate
blocks, and the same thing could easily be done with the Musa-Cromwell
TRP, which is even larger. In that case, the Minister might feel
that he would be justified in making substitutions for one or
more of the subdivisions.
- The Gara-Modewa project (approved on the
1st of June) was one of the four listed for exemption in the
Minister's address to the Round Table. The Rai Coast project
(approved on the 20th of July) was not included in the list,
and the Minister was later accused of granting this approval
in circumstances which were no more favourable to the landowners
than those which caused him to withhold approval of the Josephstaal
project (Times of PNG 4/10/90).
- The Environment Minister's credibility had
already been seriously damaged by events unconnected with the
work of the Task Force. Firstly, he had been charged with dangerous
driving causing the death of a 5-year old child in Port Moresby.
Secondly, and more pertinently, it was revealed that he had personally
approved the construction of a toxic waste dump in Oro Province
without even requesting the submission of an EP. As the sordid
details of this latter project have come to light, the Minister
seems to have decided that he might as well hand out a few more
exemptions to give the appearance of consistency, and some dubious
logging operations have already been blessed in this way.
- Membership of the Committee was initially
drawn from DFP (4), DOF (3), DEC (2), PMD (2), NANGO (1) and
UPNG (1). It was later extended to include representatives of
DAL and DLPP (1 each) and the Leader of the UNDP Technical Assistance
Team. Chairmanship of the Committee rests with the Economic Affairs
Division of DFP. Meetings are supposed to take place every fortnight,
but only seven were held between August and December 1990.
- It should be noted here that the PNG Government
has a longstanding and legitimate policy of exercising close
control over all foreign aid flowing into the country in order
to ensure that this aid is consistent with national interests
and priorities. OIDA is the watchdog of this policy.
- The New Zealand Government had also undertaken
to fund a New Zealand NGO to provide international technical
assistance to the Task Force by advising on the establishment
of a Trust Fund to finance 'benefit packages' to landowners in
proposed conservation areas.
- In theory, DEC can recruit an outsider to
the Executive Officer's position. In practice, the Department
of Personnel Management will make this difficult, at least for
a time.
- This is not to detract from the value of
the report on Woodlark written by my colleague Michael Young.
Dr Young stuck dutifully to his terms of reference, which asked
him 'to conduct a preliminary anthropological and socio-economic
survey' of Woodlark Island and 'to provide anthropological and
sociological information' to the rest of the Woodlark Team. His
report is an excellent example of what these terms of reference
can be expected to produce.
- A boom gate has recently been installed
at the entrance to the DOF building in Hohola, presumaby with
a view to exercising some form of crowd control. Having passed
through it on a number of occasions, I rather doubt its effectiveness.
- The TSG is delivering 'immediate technical
support' to DOF and DEC (see Appendix 5). The Group has four
members, three of whom (the leader, a forester and an environmentalist)
have been provided by the New Zealand Forestry Service under
a complex arrangement with the World Bank and UNDP, while the
fourth represents the NGOs and is paid out of a grant by the
British Overseas Development Agency (ODA) to the International
Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
- As with other ministerial reshuffles in
PNG, these changes have more to do with the shifting alignments
of political factions than the past administration of particular
portfolios. However, new ministers are always keen to justify
their appointments by seeming to address any popular grievances
aroused by the actions of their predecessors.
- The current DEC budget includes provision
for UPNG to provide it with various forms of 'consultancy support'
worth a total of K145,000 per annum. There is as yet little sign
that DEC has the capacity to either ask or pay for this support.
- This particular species of cuscus had previously
attracted the attention of a scientific expedition from Oxford
University, and this may have helped to enhance its conservation
value is some people's minds. But, by August of last year, the
cuscus had become the focus of a standing joke about the Task
Force in Provincial Government circles, where rumour had it that
the islanders would now set about the eradicating this hapless
creature in case it turned out to be obstacle to further development
of the island.
- It is interesting to observe here that the
Task Force recently received a suggestion from the Minister or
Secretary of Forests (it is not clear which) that its time might
be better occupied investigating the complaints of the Gogol-Naru
landowners, whose sympathy for the concept of conservation has
undoubtedly been aroused by the devastating impact of logging
on their environment. This suggestion was rejected because it
would have diverted the Task Force from its original mandate,
but the point remains that landowners may not begin to appreciate
the value of their forest resource until they have begun to lose
it.
- The essence of this problem is that the
boundaries of the resource (whether it be a logging coupe, a
mining lease, or a fishbait zone) normally fail to coincide with
the social and political boundaries prevailing within the landowning
community.
- That is why I have suggested that the socio-economic
appraisal at least should be carried out by a single expert.
At current consultancy rates, K5,000 would purchase 20 days of
work by a UPNG academic such as myself. Ten days of fieldwork
and ten days of reporting should be sufficient to complete this
type of appraisal in target areas like Woodlark or Lak.
- Compare this with the K30,000 which was
spent on the Task Force trip to New Ireland last year.