| Welcome | Navigation | Approach | TEST-Code |
| (The Open Cycle daemons build upon the open steady daemons. Visit Open Steady pages first. |
| States | Closed Process | Closed Steady | Open Steady |
| Open Process | Closed Cycle | States-II | |
| HVAC | Combustion | Equilibrium | Gas Dynamics |
| (Each section above is divided into two sub-sections - Manual and Applications.) | |
| Manual | |
|
|
(Gas Power,
Vapor Power and Refrigeration cycles
)
Daemons>Open Cycle> Applications |
|
EXAMPLE-1
|
A gas turbine power plant operates on a simple Brayton cycle with
air as the working fluid. The air enters the turbine at 1 MPa and 1000
K and leaves at 125 kPa and 610 K. Heat is rejected to the surroundings
at a rate of 8000 kW and the air flow rate is 25 kg/s. Assuming a compressor
efficiency of 80%, determine the net power output and the thermal efficiency.
Assume constant c_p.
What-if scenario: How would the answers change if the compressor efficiency were increased to 90%? |
Time Saver: To reproduce the visual solution, copy and paste this TEST-code on the I/O panel of the appropriate daemon, click the Load button, and then the Super-Calculate button and Super-Iterate button.
|
|
Step 1: Launch the appropriate Cycle Daemon.
Step 2: Set up the cycle.
Step 3: Calculate the States. |
Solution
Start the Open Cycle daemon with the perfect gas model at HOME. Daemons. Systems. Open. Steady. Specific.PowerCycles. PerfGas. Let us set up the cycle as follows: Device-A: expansion from State-1 to State-2; Device-B: constant pressure heat rejection from State-2 to State-3 ; Device-C : compression from State-3 to State-5 with State-4 being the isentropic state ; Device-D : constant pressure heat addition from State-5 to State-1 . State-1-5: Evaluate the states as described on the TEST codes. Note how the turbine efficiency is used to evaluate j3. |
|
| Fig. 1 Image of State-5. This state is completely evaluated only after Super-Calculate. |
Step 4: Analyze the four open and steady devices. |
On the
Analysis panel, work on the four
devices.
Device-A: Load State-1 and State-2 as the i1- and e1-States , enter Qdot=0, and Calculate. Device-B: Load State-2 and State-3 as the i1- and e1-States , and Calculate. Enter Qdot=-8000 kW, Wdot_ext=0 . Device-C: Load State-3 and State-5 as the i1- and e1-States , enter Qdot=0, and Calculate. The work is calculated as Wdot_ext=9799 kW. Device-D: Load State-5 and State-1 as the i1- and e1-States , enter Wdot_ext=0 and Calculate. Use Super-Calculate to update all the States and Devices. The thermal efficiency is calculated as eta_th=22.9% . On the Cycle panel, no further work is necessary. |
| Step 5: For the What-If study, change a variable, Calculate and Super-Calculate. | For the parametric study, go to the States Panel and change j3 to '=j1+(j2-j1)/.9 '. Calculate the State, Super-Calculate and Super-Iterate to update all calculations. The new answer is: eta_th=28.6% . |
|
| Fig. 2 Image of
the Device Panel. Only a single inlet and exit are used in this device |
|
EXAMPLE-2
Air enters steadily the first compressor of the gas turbine shown in Fig.
7.28 at 100 kPa and 300 K with a mass flow rate of 50 kg/s. The pressure
ratio across the two-stage compressor and turbine is 15. The intercooler
and reheater each operates at an intermediate pressure given by the square
root of the product of the first compressor and turbine inlet pressures.
The inlet temperature of each turbine is 1500 K and that of the second compressor
is 300 K. The isentropic efficiency of each compressor and turbine is 80%
and the regenerator effectiveness is also 80%. Determine (a) the thermal
efficiency. (b) What-if-Scenario How would the thermal efficiency of the
cycle change if the turbine and compressor efficiency increased to 90%? Use
the ideal gas model for air.
What-if scenario: (c)How would the thermal efficiency of the cycle change if the turbine and compressor efficiency increased to 90%? Use the ideal gas model for air. |
|
Time Saver: To reproduce the visual solution, copy and paste this TEST-code on the I/O panel of the appropriate daemon, click the Load button, and then the Super-Calculate button.
Step 1: Launch the Open Cycle
Step 2: Calculate the principal states as described in the code. Note
how p2 is entered in terms of p1 and p5 so that only property has to be changed
during the parametric study. If change in ke cannot be neglected j should
be used instead of h in defining the isentropic efficiencies. Notice how
h3, h6, h9, and h12 uses the isentropic efficiency and h13 uses the regenerator
effectivess. h14, on the other hand, is obtained from an energy balance on
the regenerator. Step 4: The net power and thermal efficiency are calculated on the Cycle Panel as calculated simply as 19.33 MW and 44.2% respectively. Step 5: For the parametric study change p5 to a new value, press the Enter key, Super-Calculate, and obtain the new answer from the Cycle Panel. Repeat as many time as needed. p5/p1 eta_th Wdot_net 5 0.426 13.78 10 0.444 17.64 15 0.442 19.33 20 0.436 20.30 25 0.430 20.80 30 0.423 21.23 |
|
EXAMPLE-3
|
In a steam power plant operating on a reheat Rankine cycle, steam
enters the HP turbine at 15 MPa and 620oC and is condensed
in the condenser at a pressure of 15 kPa. If the moisture content in
the turbine is not to exceed 10%, determine (a) the reheat pressure and
(b) the thermal efficiency of the cycle.
What-if scenario: How would the answers change if the moisture content in the turbine were not to exceed 15%? |
Time Saver: To reproduce the visual solution, copy and paste this TEST-code on the I/O panel of the appropriate daemon, click the Load button, and then the Super-Calculate button. This is
one of the cases, where you have to use the Super-Iterate button after a
Super-Calculate.
|
|
Step 1: Launch the appropriate Cycle Daemon.
Step 2: Set up the cycle.
Step 3: Calculate the States.
|
Solution
Answering the six questions described in the Approach section leads you to the appropriate daemon page for a Rankine cycle: HOME. Daemons. Systems. Open. Steady. Specific.PowerCycles. PhaseChange . Let us set up the cycle as follows: Device-A: isentropic pumping from State-1 to State-2 ; Device-B : constant pressure boiler with State-2 and State-4 as inlets and State-3 and State-5 as exits; Device-C : high pressure isentropic turbine from State-3 to State-4 ; Device-D : low pressure isentropic turbine from State-4 to State-5 ; Device-E : constant pressure heat rejection from State-4 to State-1 . State-1: Enter mdot1 (assume 1 kg/s), p1 (15 kPa) and x1 (0%). Calculate . State-2: Enter p2 (15 MPa), s2 ('=s1'), and Calculate. State-3: Enter p3 ('=p2'), T3 (620C) and Calculate. State-4: Enter p4 ('=p5'), s4 ('=s3'), and Calculate. Note that p5 is not yet known. State-5: Enter T5 ('=T3'), s5 ('=s6') and Calculate . Note that s6 is not yet known. State-6: Choose 'More...' from the state selector to add more states to the menu. Choose State-6. Enter p6 ('=p1'), x6 (90%) and Calculate. A Super-Calculate at this point propagates
s6 back to State-5 and then p5 back to State-4, thus completely evaluating
all the states. It is always a good Applications to draw a T-s or some
other thermodynamic plot to visualize the calculated states before proceeding
to the Analysis window. |
|
| Fig. 3 Image of
State-4. Only after State-6 is Calculated, a Super-Calculate
propagates p5 back to State-4 and State-4 is completely evaluated. |
Step 4: Analyze the open steady devices. |
On the
Analysis panel, work on the five
devices.
Device-a: Select Device-a . Load State-1 and State-2 as the i1- and e1-States , enter Qdot=0, and Calculate. The pumping power is calculated as -15.17 kW. Device-b: Select Device-b . Load State-2 and State-4 as the i1- and e1-States , and State-3 and State-5 as the e1- and e2-States , Calculate. Click on the 'non-mixing' radio button. Enter Wdot_ext=0. The heat transfer is 3831 kW (note that we could have broken the boiler into two devices, steam generator and superheater) . Device-c: Select Device-c . Load State-3 and State-4 as the i1- and e1-States , enter Qdot=0, and Calculate. The work is calculated as Wdot_ext=360 kW. Device-d: Select Device-d . Load State-5 and State-6 as the i1- and e1-States , enter Qdot=0 kW and Calculate. The work is calculated as Wdot_ext=1349 kW. On the Cycle panel, no further work is necessary. The thermal efficiency is calculated as eta_th=44.2% . Use Super-Calculate to produce detailed output and the TEST-Code. Use Super-Iterate for further iteration if the solution is not complete. This is one of the rare instances where the Super-Iterate button has been used. One could avoid that by working in modules. Working on State-1,3,4 and Device-d (a Super-Calculate among them will completely evaluate State-1) first will reduce the need for iterations. |
Step 5: For the What-If study, change a variable, Calculate and Super-Calculate. |
For the parametric study, change x6 to 85%, Calculate and Super-Calculate to obtain the new efficiency as 43.24% (the efficiency increases with moisture content for cycles without superheat). |
|
| Fig. 4: Image of the
Device Panel (Device-B, the boiler). Notice that the Non-Mixing
button must be turned on for the mass balance equation to be simplified. |
|
| Fig. 2.3: Image of the I/O Panel. The top part contains the TEST-Code |
EXAMPLE-4
|
A combined gas turbine-steam power plant.has a net power output
of 50 MW. Air enters the compressor of the gas turbine at 100 kPa, 300
K, and has a compression ratio of 12 and an isentropic efficiency of 85%.
The turbine has an isentropic efficienty of 90% and has the inlet conditions
of 1200 kPa and 1400 K, and an exit pressure of 100 kPa. The air from the
turbine exhaust passes through a heat exchanger and exits at 400 K. On the
steam turbine side, steam at 8 MPa, 400oC enters the turbine,
which has an isentropic efficiency of 85%, and expands to the condenser
pressure of 8 kPa. Saturated water enters the pump, which has an isentropic
efficiency of 80% at 8 kPa. Determine (a) the ratio of mass flow rates
in the two cycles, (b) the mass flow rate of air if the net power is 50
MW, (c) the thermal efficiency.
What-if scenario: How would the thermal efficiency change if the compression ratio is increased to 15? |
Time Saver: To reproduce the visual solution, copy and paste this TEST-code on the I/O panel of the appropriate daemon, click the Load button, and then the Super-Calculate button.
Step 1: Launch
Step 2: Let us base the analysis on an air flow rate of 1 kg/s. Once
the net power is calculated, the actual flow rate can be found from the
porportionality between power and mass flow rate. Step 4: We start the steam cycle calculation from State-8 leaving mdot8 as an unknown, which is to be determined from a device analysis of the heat exchanger. Step 5: All the states in the steam cycle are calculated except the mass flow rate is an unknown in each state. Step 6: Set up Device-A for the heat exchanger. Enter Qdot=Wdot_ext=0 and make sure to select the non-mixing button. A Calculate produces mdot8= , which is posted back to State-8. A Super-Calculate updates all the states. Step 7: Set up one device each for every work producing/consuming device as described on the TEST-Codes. Step 8: The net power can be calculated simply as -364 +672 +146.3 -1.5 = 452.8 kW. Step 8: The heat added can be found from Device-C as 851.3 kW. The thermal efficiency, therefore, is 452.8/851.3 = 53.2%. Step 9: To produce 50 MW of power, the air mass flow rate must be 10000/452.8 = 22.1 kg/s. Step 10: In State-2 change p2 to 15*p1, press the Enter key and Super-Calculate. In a few sedonds all the calculations are updated. The new Wdot_net= 433.3 kW and Q_in=804.6. The new thermal efficiency is 433.3/804.6= 53.9%. The net power is lower, but the efficiency has slightly improved. Step 3.11: Can you figure out why Wdot_net is not equal to Qdot_net in this problem? |
|
|
EXAMPLE-5
|
Consider a two-stage R-12 refrigeration system operating between 0.15
MPa and 1 MPa. The refrigerant leaves the condenser as saturated liquid
and is throttled to a flash chamber operating at 0.4 MPa. The vapor from
the flash chamber is mixed with the refrigerant leaving the low-pressure
compressor and the mixture is compressed by the high-pressure compressor
to the condenser pressure. The liquid in the flash chamber is throttled
to the evaporator pressure where the cooling load is handled through evaporation.
Assume the refrigerant leaves the evaporator and mixer as saturated vapor.
Determine the COP. What-if scenario: How would the COP change if the intermediate pressure were increased to 0.6 MPa? |
Time Saver: To reproduce the visual solution, copy and paste this TEST-code on the I/O panel of the appropriate daemon, click the Load button, and then the Super-Calculate button. Because
of the complexity of the problem you may have to use the Super-Iterate
button if Super-Calculate does not perform enough iteration.
|
|
Step 4.1: Launch the appropriate Cycle Daemon.
Step 4.2: Set up the cycle.
Step 4.3: Calculate the States.
|
Solution
Answering the six questions described in the Approach section leads you to the appropriate daemon page for the reverse-Rankine refrigeration cycle: HOME. Daemons. Systems. Open. Steady. Specific.RefriCycles. PhaseChange . Let us set up the cycle as follows : Device-A: isentropic compression from State-9 to State-4 ; Device-B : constant pressure heat rejection from State-4 to State-5 ; Device-C : isenthalpic expansion from State-5 to State-6 ; Device-D : constant pressure phase separation from inlet at State-6 to exits at State-3 ; Device-E : isenthalpic expansion from State-7 to State-8 ; Device-F : constant pressure heat addition from State-8 to State-1 ; Device-G : isentropic compression from State-1 State-2 ; Device-H State-3 into State-9 . The mass flow rate being an unknown, we will take 1 kg/s through the top loop as the basis for this analysis, i.e., mdot9=1 kg/s. In that case mdot3=x6*mdot9 and mdot7=(1-x6)*mdot9. In evaluating the states, we can follow two approaches. Utilize known information on devices or put them off until the Device Analysis part and let the daemon export the device info onto the affected States. For instance, in an isentropic device (say, Device-a) operating between State-1 and -2, we can enter s2 as '=s1'. Or alternatively, we could enter Qdot=0 and Sdot_gen=0 (i.e. adiabatic and reversible) in the analysis of Device-a. The Super-Calculate operation, in that case, would solve the entropy-balance equation for Device-a, conclude that s2=s1, substitute s1 for s2 in State-2, and recalculate State-2. For complex cycles such as this one, we will follow the first approach. State-1-8: Enter the known values or relations as described in the TEST-Codes and Calculate the states fully or partially. |
|
| Fig. 5 Image of
Device-D . Solution of the energy equation yields mdot3
which is posted back on State-3. Super-Calculate calculates State-3 and 7 completely and later solves the entropy equation to evaluate Sdot_gen. |
Step 4: Analyze all six open, steady devices. |
Device-A through H: For each device select a letter, load the anchor states (see the TEST-Codes above), enter the known device variable (Qdot or Wdot_ext) and Calculate. Use
Super-Calculate followed by a
Super-Iterate to update all
the States and Devices. The COP is calculated as
COP=349%.
The mass flow rate for the bottom cycle is calculated as
mdot1=0.77 kg/s. |
Step 5: For the what-if study, change a variable, Calculate and Super-Calculate. |
For the parametric study, go to the States Panel and change p2 to 0.6 MPa. Calculate the State, Super-Calculate and Super-Iterate to update all calculations. The new COP is calculated as 332%. |
|
| Fig. 4.2
Image of the Cycle Panel. Cycle variables are automaticaly calculated once the cycle is complete. |
EXAMPLE-6
|
In a gas refrigeration system air enters the compressor at 10
o C and 50 kPa and the turbine at 50oC and 250 kPa.
The mass flow rate is 0.08 kg/s. Assuming variable specific heat, determine
(a) the rate of cooling, (b) the net power input and (c) the COP.
What-if scenario: How would the answers change if the working fluid were helium instead? |
Time Saver: To reproduce the visual solution, copy and paste this TEST-code on the I/O panel of the appropriate daemon, click the Load button, and then the Super-Calculate button.
|
|
Step 1: Launch the appropriate Cycle Daemon.
Step 2: Set up the cycle. Step 3: Calculate the States.
|
Solution
Answering the six questions described in the Approach section leads you to the appropriate daemon page for a Brayton cycle: HOME. Daemons. Systems. Open. Steady. Specific.RefriCycles. IdealGas . Let us set up the cycle as follows: Device-A: compression from State-1 to State-2 ; Device-B: constant pressure heat rejection from State-2 to State-3 ; Device-C : isentropic expansion from State-3 to State-4 ; Device-D : constant pressure heat addition from State-4 to State-1 . State-1-4:
Enter known values or relations and
Calculate |
|
| Fig. 4.1 Image of the Cycle Panel for a refrigeration/heat pump cycle. |
Step 4: Analyze the four open and steady devices. |
On the
Analysis panel, work on the four
devices.
Device-A through D: As described in the TEST-Codes, identify each device by a unique letter, load the anchor states, enter the known device variables (Qdot and Wdot_ext) and Calculate. Use
Super-Calculate to produce the TEST-code
and the detailed output. On the Cycle
panel, no further work is necessary. The COP is calculated as
1.72. Now change the gas to helium
in the State panel and Super-Calculate
. |
Your input! |
You will find more examples on closed cycles on the Slide Show and the Home.TEST.Problems.Chapter08 pages. If you detect an error or any inconsistent instructions on this page, or would like to see more examples on a particular topic, please write to me using the Home.Comments page. Your input will be appreciated. |
| Manual | |
| Copyright 1998-2003: Subrata Bhattacharjee |